Naturalized metaphysics or displacing metaphysicians to save metaphysics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Naturalized metaphysics aims to establish justified metaphysical claims, where is meant carry its usual significance, while avoiding the traditional methods of metaphysics—a priori reasoning, conceptual analysis, intuitions, and common sense—which naturalized argues are not epistemically probative. After offering an explication what it means do metaphysics, this paper that at outset, hospitable doing metaphysics. The underdetermination by science, however, changes picture. has break underdetermination, but criticism leaves no resources with which so. must therefore be more restrictive than originally intended ensure some features avoid underdetermination. In metaphysicians only left task surveying opinions scientists which, argued, does qualify as Thus, fulfill promise save displaces metaphysician. Furthermore, attempt re-employ them via principle naturalistic closure argued fail. Metaphysicians should happier they explicitly eliminative trends in contemporary metametaphysics, such neo-Carnapian deflationism, despite likely Carnap’s dismay, deliver claims about ultimate reality.
منابع مشابه
Humean metaphysics versus a metaphysics of powers
The paper considers the opposition between Humean metaphysics and the metaphysics of powers, focusing on laws, probabilities and causation. It argues that within Humean metaphysics, everything is a matter of contingency. Consequently, there is no deep metaphysical difference between a deterministic world and a world in which only probabilistic laws hold. This position is contrasted with the fou...
متن کاملModern Metaphysics
Metaphysics is the science of being and asks the question “What really exists?” The answer to this question has been sought for by mankind since the beginning of recorded time. In the past 2500 years there have been many answers to this question and these answers dominate our view of how physics is done. Examples of questions which were originally metaphysical are the shape of the earth, the mo...
متن کاملJung’s metaphysics
Despite it being the focal point of his theoretical system, I argue that Jung’s notion of the archetypes is one of his least understood concepts because it was nebulous to Jung himself. Jung vacillated between viewing archetypes as analogous to primordial images and ideas inherited from our ancestral past, formal a priori categories of mind, cosmic projections, emotional and valuational agencie...
متن کاملMetaphysics of science between metaphysics and science
The paper argues that metaphysics depends upon science when it comes to claims about the constitution of the real world. That thesis is illustrated by considering the examples of global supervenience, the tenseless vs. the tensed theory of time and existence, events vs. substances, and relations vs. intrinsic properties. An argument is sketched out for a metaphysics of a fourdimensional block u...
متن کاملBy Peter Godfrey - Smith Theories and Models in Metaphysics METAPHYSICS
METAPHYSICS Peter Godfrey-Smith is professor of philosophy at Harvard University. He works primarily in the philosophy of biology and the philosophy of mind. He also has a more general interest in the philosophy of science, and makes excursions into metaphysics and epistemology. He has published two books so far: Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature (1996) and Theory and Reality (2003)...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Synthese
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0039-7857', '1573-0964']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04207-1